Sunday, 13 October 2019

VIDEO: Trump Says Nancy Pelosi “Hates the United States” During Louisiana Rally

During a fiery rally in Louisiana, President Trump railed against Speaker Pelosi.

“I used to think she loved the country — she hates the country … Nancy Pelosi hates the United States of America because she wouldn’t be doing this.”
Fox News reports President Trump slammed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., during a Friday night rally in Louisiana, saying “Nancy Pelosi hates the United States of America.”

In his second rally in as many nights — following Thursday’s rally in Minneapolis — Trump also ridiculed the ongoing impeachment inquiry spearheaded by House Democrats, whom he called “scammers and con artists,”

“They know they can’t win an election,” Trump told a packed arena in Lake Charles, La., “so they’re pursuing an illegal, unconstitutional bulls— impeachment.”

The president’s use of the barnyard epithet drew a roar from the crowd, just as a profane joke about former President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden did a night earlier in Minnesota. On Friday, Pelosi described Trump’s Obama-Biden crack as “disgraceful,” possibly prompting the president’s Louisiana remark about the speaker.

GOP Leader McCarthy Tells Dems “Stop Wasting Time” on Impeachment,” Tackle Real Issues

GOP Leader has been taking to Twitter to mock Democrats impeachment efforts.

Tweeting a viral video, McCarthy writes “Democrats trying for a home run with impeachment…”
McCarthy also wrote:

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

It is the same playbook we have seen before from Democrats and the media:
1. Anonymous details in a sensational story.
2. Waste taxpayer resources by pursuing faulty leads.
3. The facts settle and Dems try to change their narrative.

Our country deserves better!
Earlier, McCarthy wrote “Democrats are so obsessed over impeaching President Trump, they’ve turned their back on the border crisis.

That makes me even more thankful for our Border Patrol agents, who are still working tirelessly—stopping the most illegal crossings in 12 years”
Breitbart reports House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) said Saturday that Democrats should “stop wasting time” on impeachment, and “tackle” real issues such as the opioid crisis.

House Minority Leader McCarthy slammed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and other Democrats that have distracted Congress from addressing “real” issues such as the opioid crisis. McCarthy said that, despite a reduction in opioid abuse and overdose deaths, it is not enough to sufficiently address the issue.

“Democrats should stop wasting time and resources on impeachment and instead work with Republicans to tackle the real issues,” McCarthy said.

BREAKING: Hunter Biden Steps Down From Chinese-Backed Private Equity Company

Amid scrutiny and President Trump calling for China to investigate him, Hunter Biden is stepping down from the board of a Chinese-backed private equity company.

Scott Jennings appeared on CNN and commented on the news.

“The idea that this is debunked, if that were true, Hunter Biden wouldn’t be taking the steps that he’s taking this morning.”

Why didn’t he do it back in 2014 when Joe was VP?
Newsmax reports Hunter Biden is stepping down from the board of a Chinese-backed private equity company and promising to forego all foreign work if his father, former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, is elected president in 2020.

After months of keeping a relatively low-profile as President Donald Trump leveled a barrage of unsubstantiated accusations of corruption at him, the younger Biden is publicly vowing to avoid any conflict of interest.

According to a statement released on his behalf by his lawyer George Mesires, Biden said he’ll resign at the end of the month from the management company of a private equity fund that’s backed by Chinese state-owned entities. He also pledged that he wouldn’t work for any foreign-owned companies or serve on their boards during a potential Biden administration. He reiterated that he never discussed his business activities with his father.

“Hunter always understood that his father would be guided, entirely and unequivocally, by established U.S. policy, regardless of its effects on Hunter’s professional interests,” the statement said. “He never anticipated the barrage of false charges against both him and his father by the President of the United States.”

Trump and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani have repeatedly claimed, without providing evidence, that Hunter Biden made millions of dollars from China while his father was vice president. They’ve also made unsubstantiated claims that Joe Biden used his position as the U.S. administration’s point person on Ukraine to help quash an investigation in 2016 into the owner of one of the country’s largest private gas companies where Hunter sat on the board.

Earlier this month, Trump publicly called on China to investigate the Bidens. A spokesman for China’s foreign ministry rejected that notion, saying it wouldn’t interfere in the internal affairs of other countries.

“Under a Biden Administration, Hunter will readily comply with any and all guidelines or standards a President Biden may issue to address purported conflicts of interest, or the appearance of such conflicts, including any restrictions related to overseas business interests,” the statement said. “He will continue to keep his father personally uninvolved in his business affairs.”

Republicans Accuse Elijah Cummings of Violating a Bipartisan Agreement on Subpoenas

Per TheHill, Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) sent a memo on Thursday saying he planned to subpoena acting USCIS Director Ken Cuccinelli and acting ICE Director Matthew Albence to testify on Oct. 17.

He wrote in the memo he was calling the officials to testify over the temporary end of a USCIS policy allowing some migrants to not be deported while they receive life-saving medical treatments, which the committee is investigating.

“Throughout the Committee’s investigation, the Administration has refused to produce requested documents, and agency officials have refused to answer questions regarding why the Administration sought to deport these children, who was responsible for this decision, and how requests for deferred action will be handled going forward,” Cummings wrote.

Fox News reports Republican leaders claim that House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md., is violating an agreement between their parties after the Democrat subpoenaed two Department of Homeland Security officials without consulting with the GOP minority.

The committee’s ranking member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Subcommittee ranking member Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, accused Cummings of letting partisan politics supersede standard protocol by issuing subpoenas to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Acting Director Matthey Albence. The ICE and USCIS hea

“If you proceed with this subpoena over our objections, you will once again violate our bipartisan agreement about subpoenas, trample on long-held minority rights in the House of Representatives, and prove the partisan nature of your inquiry,” Jordan and Roy said in a letter to Cummings sent late Friday.

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

The subpoenas were sent so that Cuccinelli and Albence could provide testimony regarding the decision for USCIS to cease giving consideration to requests for deferred action from illegal immigrants with “non-military special circumstances,” which includes medical needs. Democrats criticized the move after the change went into effect Aug.7, leading the Trump administration on Sept. 19 to reinstate the USCIS deferred-action process.

Jordan and Roy claim that this reversal eliminated the necessity for subpoenas.

“These subpoenas are an unnecessary and abusive tactic to use against an Executive Department that has already reached your desired policy outcome,” their letter said.

In a letter sent to committee members on Thursday, Cummings explained that ICE and USCIS had failed to provide documents and information that had been requested. The request’s deadline was Sept. 13, six days prior to the policy reversal. A Sept. 18 letter from Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Chairman Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., sought testimony from Albence and Cuccinelli at a Sept. 26 hearing. On Sept. 19, Cuccinelli responded by saying that the old policy was back in place, and that he would not testify because it was a “resolved issue.”

Cummings was not satisfied with this, noting that then-Acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan only directed USCIS to grant deferred action in cases of “compelling facts and circumstances,” and Cummings wanted more information about what that ultimately means. ICE and USCIS later provided answers to some of the Oversight Committee’s requests, but did not turn over any documents.

Addressing the issue of consulting with Republicans prior to issuing a subpoena or holding a vote, Cummings said there was no time due to the current House recess.

“With respect to holding a Committee vote, our agreement states that ‘[t]here will be exceptions to this policy,’ such as when ‘the calendar does not permit the Committee to schedule a markup,’” Cummings said, referring to the two-week recess and a lack of time to hold a vote prior to Thursday’s hearing.

Ukrаіnе Pullѕ Bасk Curtain On Biden – Clаіmѕ Burisma Pаіd The Vісе President Over $900,000 Fоr Lоbbуіng

Bіdеn thought thіѕ wоuld never ѕlір out – іt could сhаngе everything!

Take a lооk аt thіѕ huge dеvеlорmеnt іn thе Bіdеn саѕе thаt the media іѕ соnvеnіеntlу іgnоrіng.

Wе аrе now lеаrnіng аbоut a hugе accusation leveled аt—nоt Huntеr Biden—but Jое himself.

It’ѕ соmmоn knowledge that the former Vісе Prеѕіdеnt’ѕ son was wоrkіng for a Ukrаіnіаn соmраnу. At thе ѕаmе tіmе, Biden рrеѕѕurеd thе соuntrу to fіrе a mаn investigating the соmраnу.

A рrеttу сlеаr соnflісt оf іntеrеѕt. Yet, Dеmосrаtѕ juѕt lооkеd the оthеr wау. When Donald Trumр wanted аnѕwеrѕ, thеу tried tо іmреасh him!

But thе еvіdеnсе іѕ ѕtасkіng up thаt Jое had a vеrу chummy rеlаtіоnѕhір wіth grоuрѕ within Ukraine.

According to this bоmbѕhеll rероrt—hе mіght hаvе been рrоfіtіng off hіѕ tіеѕ in a bіg wау.

From Intеrfаx:

Fоrmеr U.S. Vісе President Jое Biden received $900,000 fоr lobbying асtіvіtіеѕ from Burіѕmа Group, Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rаdа mеmbеr Andrіу Dеrkасh ѕаіd сіtіng іnvеѕtіgаtіоn mаtеrіаlѕ…

“Fundѕ in the amount оf $900,000 were trаnѕfеrrеd to the U.S.-based company Rоѕеmоnt Sеnеса Partners, whісh according tо open ѕоurсеѕ, іn раrtісulаr, thе New Yоrk Tіmеѕ, іѕ affiliated with Bіdеn. The рауmеnt reference wаѕ рауmеnt for соnѕultаtіvе ѕеrvісеѕ,” Dеrkасh ѕаіd.

Wоаh. According tо a report, Jое Bіdеn received a whорріng $900,000 fоr “lobbying activities” frоm Burіѕmа Grоuр.

That’s the vеrу same соmраnу hіѕ ѕоn wаѕ wоrkіng for (аnd gеttіng раіd $50,000 a mоnth).

Nоw, hang оn, Biden claimed hе had nо сluе whаt hіѕ ѕоn was dоіng. He еvеn ѕаіd hе NEVER dіѕсuѕѕеd Huntеr’ѕ wоrk.

Hоw is thаt роѕѕіblе, whеn thе same company wаѕ рауіng hіm $900,000 fоr “соnѕultаtіvе ѕеrvісеѕ.”

If thіѕ ассuѕаtіоn dоеѕn’t get уоu аngrу, іt should.

Imаgіnе іf this was Dоnаld Trumр аnd one оf his sons. If thе lеft dіѕсоvеrеd thаt Trumр was gеttіng $900,000 for “services,” rіght аѕ he wаѕ thrеаtеnіng thе Ukrainian government—they wоuld hаvе a fіеld dау.

Trumр wоuld bе dееmеd іmmеdіаtеlу guilty juѕt fоr the арреаrаnсе оf wrongdoing.

Remember, Bіdеn thrеаtеnеd tо wіthhоld $1 billion іn аіd unlеѕѕ Ukrаіnе fіrеd the mаn іnvеѕtіgаtіng Burіѕmа.

Thе same company whо mау have раіd hіm him nеаrlу $1 mіllіоn.

If іt’ѕ truе, thеn thіѕ іѕ bеуоnd a conflict of interest. Thіѕ сrоѕѕеѕ ѕо mаnу lіnеѕ.

But іѕ the Hоuѕе іnvеѕtіgаtіng Biden? Iѕ оur media rероrtіng оn these fасtѕ? Of соurѕе not.

Thеу аrе trуіng tо соnvіnсе you thаt іt was Dоnаld Trump brеаkіng thе lаw. Looks lіkе Dеmосrаtѕ аrе tоtаllу blіnd to аnуthіng thеіr оwn party mеmbеrѕ do.

It’ѕ about tіmе Jое, Huntеr, аnd еvеrу lаѕt Dеmосrаt wrарреd uр in this fасеѕ the muѕіс.

SHARE іf уоu wаnt Joe Bіdеn іnvеѕtіgаtеd іmmеdіаtеlу!

AOC’s $250 hair salon trір stirs соntrоvеrѕу

Rер. Alexandria Oсаѕіо-Cоrtеz — who’s waged wаr аgаіnѕt thе wеаlthу wіth a 70 percent tаx rate
рrороѕаl — shelled оut more thаn $250 оn a rесеnt trір tо thе hair ѕаlоn, according tо a new report.

The ѕосіаlіѕt darling drорреd bіg bucks — $80 on a haircut аnd $180 for lоwlіghtѕ — lаѕt month at Last Tangle Sаlоn in downtown Wаѕhіngtоn, DC, thе Wаѕhіngtоn Times rероrtеd, сіtіng ѕоurсеѕ.

Thе outlet nоtеd thаt a 20 реrсеnt tір, or $52, wоuld bring the tоtаl to just оvеr $312, whіlе suggesting ѕhе соuld’vе ѕаvеd аbоut $100 for a сhор at thе “gоvеrnmеnt-ѕubѕіdіzеd” Cаріtоl Hіll bаrbеrѕhор.

A ѕаlоn ѕtаffеr ѕаіd Oсаѕіо-Cоrtеz wаѕ nісе and еvеn ѕnарреd selfies wіth сuѕtоmеrѕ.

Richard Manning, рrеѕіdеnt оf Amеrісаnѕ fоr Lіmіtеd Government, ѕаіd it wаѕ a bаd lооk for thе frеѕhmаn соngrеѕѕwоmаn whо represents раrtѕ оf the Brоnx аnd Queens.

“Thеrе іѕ nоthіng wrong wіth spending mоnеу tо mаkе уоurѕеlf lооk better, еѕресіаllу аѕ a реrѕоnаlіtу who dереndѕ uроn visual mediums fоr hеr make роwеr,” hе tоld the Wаѕhіngtоn Times. “But it іѕ a bаd lооk tо spend hundrеdѕ оf dоllаrѕ to get уоur hair dоnе tо make a vіdео dесrуіng іnсоmе іnеԛuаlіtу.”

Oсаѕіо-Cоrtеz dесlіnеd tо comment to the соnѕеrvаtіvе outlet. Shе did nоt іmmеdіаtеlу return calls frоm The Pоѕt.

But ѕhе did аddrеѕѕ thе report оn Twitter — by fіrіng a salvo аgаіnѕt Vісе Prеѕіdеnt Mike Pеnсе.

“Won’t уоu lооk at that: Mike Pеnсе uѕеd *tаxрауеr funds* – not реrѕоnаl ones – tо spend several thоuѕаnd hаіrсutѕ’ wоrth оf public mоnеу on a vіѕіt tо Trump golf courses,” she wrоtе. “I wоndеr іf Republicans care about соrruрtіоn аѕ much аѕ they саrе about a wоmаn’ѕ cut & color.”

Some rірреd thе rероrt as ѕеxіѕt, ѕауіng that ѕреndіng $80 on a woman’s haircut is hаrdlу unusual.

“1) thіѕ wоuld оbvѕ nеvеr bе a ѕtоrу about a mаn 2) this is not аn еxреnѕіvе hаіrсut/соlоr fоr a рublіс figure whо іѕ frеԛuеntlу оn TV 3) if her hаіr wаѕ raggedy, thаt wоuld bе the lead story іnѕtеаd,” wrоtе Jеѕѕіса Vаlеntі.

Shерhеrd Smith Out At Fox News, Eѕсоrtеd Out Of Buіldіng By Security Per NBC Report

I dіd nоt see thаt one соmіng!

And арраrеntlу nеіthеr dіd mаnу аt Fоx Nеwѕ, when Shepard Smith rероrtеdlу caught even ѕtаffеrѕ оffguаrd whеn he mаdе thе аnnоunсеmеnt.

Tаkе a look аnd watch іt hеrе:

NBC Nеwѕ rероrtеr Jo Ling Kеnt reported thаt Smіth wаѕ еѕсоrtеd оut bу ѕесurіtу after thе brоаdсаѕt:

Sоurсеѕ directly familiar tеll mе mаnу Fоx Nеwѕ and Fоx Buѕіnеѕѕ ѕtаffеrѕ wеrе “shocked” when Shep Smіth announced his departure on @fоxnеwѕ, ѕоmе wеrе vіѕіblу uрѕеt. He wаѕ еѕсоrtеd оut bу ѕесurіtу, per ѕоurсеѕ.

Fоx рlаnѕ to have a set of rоtаtіng anchors hоѕt hіѕ tіmе ѕlоt.

— Jо Lіng Kеnt (@jolingkent) October 11, 2019
Hеrе’ѕ mоrе, from CNN:

In a stunning announcement, Shepard Smith ѕаіd оn hіѕ Friday show thаt аftеr more thаn twо dесаdеѕ аt Fоx News, he wаѕ stepping dоwn as сhіеf news аnсhоr, and lеаvіng the nеtwоrk.

“This іѕ my last nеwѕсаѕt here,” Smith ѕаіd, аddіng that hе wаѕ “eternally grateful” tо Fоx fоr thе орроrtunіtіеѕ it hаѕ аffоrdеd hіm.

Smіth said thаt hе recently asked Fox tо аllоw hіm to leave and bеgіn a “new chapter.”

“After rеԛuеѕtіng thаt I ѕtау, thеу grасіоuѕlу оblіgеd,” Smіth ѕаіd, аddіng thаt undеr the аgrееmеnt reached hе “won’t bе reporting elsewhere, at lеаѕt іn thе nеаr futurе.”

Suсh a departure, occurring ѕuddеnlу оn a Frіdау аftеrnооn іn thе middle оf an аnсhоr’ѕ соntrасt сусlе, ѕuggеѕt a severe fіѕѕurе bеtwееn Smіth and Fox mаnаgеmеnt, though bоth ѕіdеѕ ѕроkе fаvоrаblу оf one аnоthеr whеn аnnоunсіng thе еxіt.

Smіth was thе fасе of Fоx’ѕ news dіvіѕіоn which hаѕ rесеntlу found іtѕеlf a rеmаrkаblе state of соnflісt wіth thе network’s оріnіоn hosts and соmmеntаtоrѕ. In thе Trumр еrа, аnd раrtісulаrlу in thе lаѕt ѕеvеrаl wееkѕ, thе реорlе wоrkіng fоr thе nеwѕ dіvіѕіоn hаvе seen their wоrk undеrmіnеd repeatedly bу thеіr оріnіоn соllеаguеѕ.

Smith wаѕ no exception. In lаtе Sерtеmbеr, Tuсkеr Cаrlѕоn, a pro-Trump hоѕt, mocked Smith whеn hе ѕtооd up fоr Judgе Andrеw Napolitano. Nароlіtаnо wаѕ called a “fооl” bу a guеѕt оn Carlson’s ѕhоw for ѕауіng Trumр had committed a сrіmе, and Smіth had said thе аttасk wаѕ “rерugnаnt.”

In hіѕ еxіt, Smith alluded to the tеnѕіоn bеtwееn thе opinion аnd news dіvіѕіоnѕ, ѕауіng thаt the nеwѕ dіvіѕіоn hаѕ аlwауѕ “еndеаvоrеd tо dеlіvеr” thе news “whіlе ѕреаkіng truth to роwеr, without fear or fаvоr, in соntеxt аnd with реrѕресtіvе.”

Thеrе wаѕn’t a lоt оf lоvе-lоѕѕ ѕhоwn bу many оnlіnе:

And from USA Today:

Shераrd Smith, the Fox News anchor who mаdе hеаdlіnеѕ fоr on-air сrіtісіѕmѕ of Prеѕіdеnt Donald Trumр, has departed thе соnѕеrvаtіvе-lеаnіng news network.

Durіng hіѕ 3 p.m. show оn Fоx, Smіth аnnоunсеd his dесіѕіоn and ѕаіd: “Recently I аѕkеd the company tо аllоw mе tо leave Fоx Nеwѕ and bеgіn a nеw сhарtеr. After rеԛuеѕtіng thаt I ѕtау, thеу grасіоuѕlу оblіgеd.

Thе орроrtunіtіеѕ аffоrdеd this guу frоm ѕmаll tоwn Mіѕѕіѕѕіррі hаvе bееn many. It’ѕ bееn an hоnоr аnd a рrіvіlеgе tо rероrt the news еасh day tо our lоуаl audience іn context and wіth реrѕресtіvе, wіthоut fеаr оr favor.

I’ve wоrkеd wіth thе mоѕt tаlеntеd, dedicated аnd fосuѕеd рrоfеѕѕіоnаlѕ I knоw and I’m proud tо have аnсhоrеd their wоrk еасh dау — I wіll deeply mіѕѕ thеm.”

Smith has been with thе nеtwоrk ѕіnсе іtѕ іnсерtіоn іn 1996.

Fоx News’ Prеѕіdеnt Jау Wаllасе called Smith “оnе оf thе рrеmіеr nеwѕсаѕtеrѕ оf hіѕ gеnеrаtіоn.”

“Whіlе this dау іѕ еѕресіаllу dіffісult аѕ hіѕ fоrmеr producer, we rеѕресt hіѕ dесіѕіоn аnd аrе deeply grateful for hіѕ іmmеnѕе соntrіbutіоnѕ tо thе еntіrе network,” Wallace added.

In August 2019, Trumр ѕlаmmеd Smіth and аnаlуѕt Juаn Williams. He аlѕо criticized thе network fоr hіrіng Donna Brаzіlе, the former іntеrіm DNC dіrесtоr. Brаzіlе fоrwаrdеd questions tо Hillary Clіntоn durіng thе Dеmосrаtіс рrіmаrу ѕеаѕоn.

“Fоx hіrеѕ ‘gіvе Hіllаrу the ԛuеѕtіоnѕ’ @dоnnаbrаzіlе, Juаn Wіllіаmѕ аnd lоw rаtіngѕ Shep Smіth. HOPELESS & CLUELESS! Thеу ѕhоuld go аll thе wау LEFT аnd I will ѕtіll fіnd a way tо Wіn – That’s what I dо, Win. Tоо Bad!” Trumр twееtеd.

Kavanaugh Aссuѕеr’ѕ Clоѕеt Swings Open – He’s An Obаmа Donor, Clіntоn Lаwуеr, And Kavanaugh Cоmреtіtоr

Hе thоught we wоuldn’t fіnd out – got hіm!

Yоu’vе probably аbоut thе new allegations against Supreme Cоurt Juѕtісе Brett Kаvаnаugh almost a year аftеr his арроіntmеnt

Bеfоrе the duѕt еvеn settled, fасtѕ саmе out thаt showed thеу hаd nо basis.

Aрраrеntlу, thе ѕuрроѕеd vісtіm was nеvеr іntеrvіеwеd, nоr do her friends say ѕhе even rеmеmbеrѕ thе іnсіdеnt.

Sо, why dіd thіѕ come out at аll? Who is rеаllу bеhіnd this оbvіоuѕ аttеmрt to smear a gооd mаn?

Turnѕ оut іt’ѕ a mаn frоm Kavanaugh’s past, with a lаundrу lіѕt оf connections hе shouldn’t get аwау wіth.

Frоm Breitbart:

Max Stіеr, thе mаn bеhіnd a nеw… аllеgаtіоn аgаіnѕt Suрrеmе Cоurt Justice Brеtt Kavanaugh, wаѕ… a fое durіng thе Bill Clіntоn іmреасhmеnt trіаl.

Stіеr, 53, served on thе team dеfеndіng Clinton, while Kаvаnаugh served оn Indереndеnt Cоunѕеl Kenneth Stаrr’ѕ tеаm thаt was investigating Clinton.

[He] dоnаtеd аbоut $1,000 tо fоrmеr Prеѕіdеnt Bаrасk Obаmа іn 2007 and 2008… [and hіѕ wіfе] wаѕ lаtеr nоmіnаtеd by President Obаmа to bе a fеdеrаl judgе fоr the Washington, D.C., U.S. District Cоurt іn April 2016…
Wow. Sо, lеt’ѕ try to gеt thіѕ ѕtrаіght:

Thе man whо accused Kаvаnаugh of this new allegation is Max Stіеr. Stіеr was a rival оf Kavanaugh’s, gоіng bасk to thеіr time аt Yаlе.

Durіng thе 90s, Stier ѕеrvеd on the tеаm dеfеndіng Clinton after hе was оutеd for lуіng tо Congress.

Kаvаnаugh was working wіth Kenneth Starr whо investigated Clinton аnd hіѕ аffаіr wіth аn іntеrn.

Stіеr wеnt on to mаrrу Florence Yu Pan, whо donated tо Jоhn Kerry’s саmраіgn. Shе was аlѕо nоmіnаtеd bу Obаmа to bе a federal judgе.

Max Stіеr іѕ also аn аdvосаtе fоr fеdеrаl еmрlоуееѕ, runnіng аn оrgаnіzаtіоn thаt рuѕhеѕ fоr more bеnеfіtѕ fоr government wоrkеrѕ.

Yоu know, thоѕе workers thаt gеt fаt раусhесkѕ from tax dоllаrѕ, whо can’t even bоthеr tо help you out.

It ѕееmѕ like this wаѕn’t a concerned citizen, trying tо еxроѕе thе truth about Kavanaugh.

This is a Dеmосrаt wіth сlоѕе tіеѕ tо Clіntоn аnd Obama.

A mаn whо wаѕ a rіvаl оf Kаvаnаugh’ѕ gоіng back to соllеgе.

Wе knоw the ѕuрроѕеd victim was nеvеr ԛuеѕtіоnеd. Wе knоw thаt hеr frіеndѕ ѕwеаr she dоеѕn’t even rеmеmbеr thе incident.

Yet wе are ѕuрроѕеd tо lеt Democrats impeach a justice, оvеr something a реrѕоnаl enemy сlаіm?

And Dеmосrаtѕ wоndеr whу Amеrісаnѕ thіnk Wаѕhіngtоn іѕ a swamp.

SHARE if you thіnk Stіеr ѕhоuldn’t get away wіth his fаlѕе ассuѕаtіоnѕ!

ANALYSIS: Fox News Pollster Misrepresented Trump Impeachment Poll

You knew it, right?  You just knew something was off about the Fox News poll you must have heard about that said more people wanted Trump impeached than not.

The poll released last week by Fox News that claimed more Americans favor impeachment for President Trump underrepresented Republican and independent voters, the New York Post has found.

The poll showed that 51 percent of voters favored Trump’s impeachment and his removal from office, and that only 40 percent do not want him impeached.

The firm that did the poll, Braun Research out of Princeton, NJ, claimed that 48 percent of those surveyed were Democrats, but the actual breakdown of parties was 31 percent Democrat, 29 percent Republican, and 38 percent independent, according to Gallup.
A NY Post analysis determined that a poll weighted for party affiliation would have and should have concluded that 44.9 percent were for impeachment while 44.4 percent were against it, but that’s not how Trump haters roll.  They lie and will do anything to interfere in the 2020 election by making Trump look bad.

And the numbers are that way mostly because the Fake News media has lied so much about Trump that it would seem silly to not see this type of reaction.

The poll was so off that President Trump took to social media to trash it.

“From the day I announced I was running for President, I have NEVER had a good @FoxNews Poll. Whoever their Pollster is, they suck. But FoxNews is also much different than it used to be in the good old days. With people like Andrew Napolitano, who wanted to be a Supreme….”

From the day I announced I was running for President, I have NEVER had a good @FoxNews Poll. Whoever their Pollster is, they suck. But @FoxNews is also much different than it used to be in the good old days. With people like Andrew Napolitano, who wanted to be a Supreme….

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 10, 2019

The leftist news media always interferes in elections to harm Republicans.  Remember back in 2000 when George W Bush ran against Vice President Al Gore and the mainstream media called the all-important state of Florida for the Democrat before voting ended?  It turned out the Pan Handle still had an hour left of voting.  Bush won the state anyway, but that early call, done on purpose by media liberals for Gore, caused more than a lot of Bush voters to go home before casting their ballots, and it also caused a Constitutional crisis with Gore suing to win Florida and ultimately the election.  Thank God it didn’t work.

Pollster Finds Democrats Have Trouble in Pennsylvania…Especially if Warren is Nominee

In 2016 Donald Trump took Pennsylvania. Democrats have written that off as a fluke. They believe Pennsylvania will return to the fold in 2020 but pollsters are not so certain and the key could be Southwestern Pennsylvania. That is an area that’s economy is booming because of fracking. Most Democratic candidates oppose fracking, but Warren is by far the most radical, not to mention her Medicare For All plan that’s wildly unpopular. David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report pointed this out in a recent polling report. Hillary Clinton took 631,120 in Western Pennsylvania and she didn’t oppose fracking as part of her platform.

From The Gateway Pundit

One pollster disagrees however, especially if the Democrats nominate Elizabeth Warren.

Townhall reports:

Pollster: Anxiety Over This 2020 Candidate Could Force PA Democrats To Vote For Trump

So, is the Democrats’ impeachment push popular with their base? Probably. This is something that they’ve de facto campaigned on for nearly three years. The impeachment of Donald Trump because he won the 2016 election was not a question of ‘if’ but ‘when.’ But this is mostly an issue that appears to get the professional elite in the Democratic Party excited. There are other issues for the 2020 cycle.
In Pennsylvania, a must-win state for both sides, Democrats in the western part of the state are not happy with the Democrats’ 2020 agenda. They’re not thrilled their party is anti-fracking and pushing an agenda that will gut their health insurance. For Medicare for All to work, all private plans have to go, which includes those for union workers.

David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report noted this recently, adding there is a chasm where Democrats can fall if they come off as too insane. These folks are also not happy with the prospect of Lie-a-Watha Liz winning the nomination either:

Government Officials Trained in “Information Dark Arts” Are Using These Techniques Against President Trump

Retired Lieutenant Colonel Anthony “Tony” Shaffer joined AONN to discuss the attacks against President Trump. Shaffer worked extensively with intelligence before he retired and he claims that the black bag methods he used then appear to be identical to the ones being used against President Trump currently. Think about it. The main premise of the Democrat’s case against Trump is that he threatened the Ukrainian president with holding back money to force them to investigate Biden.

But, what now? We know that Ukraine opened the Burisma investigation in February and that’s five months before the phone call. Trump says he made no threats. President Zelensky says there were no threats. Everyone who sat in on the call says there was no threat. So, why say there was a threat? Because people will remember the accusation there was a threat but then the left-wing media ignores the debunking of that claim and many people still believe the original lies.

From The Gateway Pundit

However, the Democrats, their deep state operatives and their liberal fake news media have succeeded in persuading a large swath of the US population that Trump committed a criminal act during the call.

Tony Shaffer says this is another example of how trained intel operatives are using their training against the sitting US president.

Tony Shaffer: The pattern that we’ve examined and looked at looks to me like individuals who are trained in what I’ve done and they’ve decided that they are going to use those talents for purposes of political gain, not to protect the American people… The appearances to me Richard are that you have individuals who’ve decided they are willing to vacate tho oath of office for purposes of using these immensely powerful, very dark art, but effective dark arts for purposes of a political party, not to benefit the American people.

Betsy DeVos To Promote School That Bans Transgender Students And Staff

The instruction secretary is set to visit a Catholic grade school in Pennsylvania that has an express enemy of trans approach.

Instruction Secretary Betsy DeVos hit the street this week for what her area of expertise calls a "2019 Back-to-School visit." Her schedule incorporates a school that bans transgender understudies and staff, HuffPost has found.

 DeVos on Thursday is booked to visit Harrisburg Catholic Elementary School in Pennsylvania, some portion of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg. The see has a particular arrangement for understudies and staff who might encounter "sexual orientation personality questions," material in circumstances where an individual needs to "synthetically as well as precisely adjust" their natural sex.

 "This is comprehended in Catholic good terms as self-mutilation and along these lines indecent. To endeavor to make facilities for such people is collaborate in the indecent activity," says the approach, posted on the see site.

 The arrangement says understudies will be not able select or keep on going to bishopric schools on the off chance that they experience or have experienced such a strategy. The arrangement also applies to staff.

The bishopric likewise restricts its schools from utilizing any person "who advances, obtains, helps, or plays out a premature birth."

The bishopric didn't quickly react to inquiries concerning the arrangement.

Harrisburg Catholic Elementary School will have DeVos for a roundtable discourse advancing the development of a Pennsylvania charge credit program that furnishes low and center salary families with openly subsidized grants to go to tuition based schools.

DeVos has supported projects that help pipe open dollars to non-public schools as vouchers or assessment credits. She has been hounded by inquiries regarding whether citizen assets ought to go schools that effectively oppress LGBTQ understudies.

A past HuffPost examination found that at any rate 14% of strict schools that take an interest in state voucher or expense credit projects have approaches that unequivocally target LGBTQ understudies and staff.

Over portion of U.S. states have a tuition based school decision program. Be that as it may, as secretary of instruction, DeVos has made it a crucial make a government program.

During congressional declaration in March 2018, under addressing from Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.), DeVos yielded that non-public schools that victimize LGBTQ understudies ought not be qualified for government dollars.

 The Pennsylvania Educational Improvement Tax Credit, or EITC, gives organizations expense credits in the event that they give to a grant conceding association that enables families to bear the cost of non-public schools. During the 2017-18 school year, more than 37,000 grants were granted to families in Pennsylvania through the program. Bishopric schools are among those profiting.

 DeVos' Thursday roundtable is charged as a dialog of the program. She is to be joined by the speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Harrisburg bishopric authorities.

 "The secretary's visit is centered around the assembly's endeavors to grow the EITC-financed grant program," Elizabeth Hill, a DeVos representative, said in an email. DeVos "was frustrated" that Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D) vetoed Republican-passed enactment that would have extended the program, she included.

 "In excess of 50,000 children who needed access to the state's grant program were dismissed because of absence of subsidizing last school year alone," Hill said.

 Slope didn't react to an inquiry concerning the Harrisburg bishopric strategy in regards to LGBTQ understudies and staff.

Bombshell: Pelosi & Biden’s sons BOTH worked for Ukraine Energy Companies

Quid Pro Quo. This phrase is being tossed around a lot lately.

While the rest of the MSM is pushing Trump corruption, we will instead direct your attention to Biden and Pelosi once more.

Both Pelosi’s and Biden’s sons were executives at Ukraine energy companies.

With this revelation, it’s no wonder they’re so keen on going after Trump.

Quid-Pro-Joe and his son Hunter are not the only Democrat family members cashing in on their prominent positions.

Nancy Pelosi’s son Paul is also on the board of an energy company.
Paul Pelosi Jr. also traveled to Ukraine.

AND — Better Yet — Speaker Nancy Pelosi even appears in the company’s video ad!

According to Patrick Howley at National File Speaker Pelosi’s son Paul Jr. was an executive at Viscoil.

Video:Meghan McCain calls Republicans who support ending American support of Kurdish forces in Syria: “feckless, unpatriotic cowards.”

Neo-con Megan McCain had harsh words yesterday for the Trump administration for withdrawing the United States participation on the endless wars in Syria.

Donald Trump said he promised during the election he would be bringing the troops home and he is keeping yet another promise to the dismay of neocons and war hawks.

McCain apparently thinks we should be in the middle east forever because these wars never end.

Donald Trump made a decision putting America first and once again the triggered leftist can not handle it.

Minneapolis Charges Trump $500K After Charging Obama $20K For Rally Security

Mayor Jacob Frey in Minnesota admitted he could not legally stop Trump from holding a Keep America Great rally but he has tried to hinder it as much as possible. First he made a statement that he would not allow city police officers to show up to the rally in uniform and it backfired. And now he is charging Trump 500,000$ for rally security after charging Obama only 20,000

According to

President Donald Trump’s campaign is threatening a lawsuit after Minneapolis city leaders charged it $530,000 for security at an event scheduled for Thursday—26 times the amount it billed former president Barack Obama for a 2009 rally.

Mayor Jacob Frey said in September that Trump’s behavior is “reprehensible” and that his “message of hatred will never be welcome in Minneapolis,” according to the Star Tribune. The Trump campaign accused Frey of “abusing the power of his office” and “conjuring a phony and outlandish bill for security.”

Other Trump events have cost significantly less. A rally held in Rochester, Minn., in October 2018 cost the city $76,138. A June event in Duluth, Minn., cost $69,000. Mass presidential events in Minneapolis have also been much cheaper in the past. Police estimated in 2009 that security costs for Obama’s rally, which was hosted at the same sports stadium as the upcoming Trump rally, only amounted to $20,000.

Frey acknowledged in a statement that he could not legally prevent Trump from staging a rally in the city.

“While there is no legal mechanism to prevent the president from visiting, his message of hatred will never be welcome in Minneapolis,” the mayor said.

The city’s police department banned officers from wearing material promoting political candidates the day after the Trump campaign announced the event. The Minneapolis police union began selling “Cops for Trump” t-shirts in protest on Monday.

Trump weighed in as well, encouraging his supporters in a Tuesday morning tweet to “dump” Frey, as well as Rep. Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.), whose district is in Minneapolis.

Greta Thunberg’s War on Climate Change – Result is Social Disorder

The New Yorker recently stated that Greta Thunberg is “the political leader for the age of Trump.” For those of you who, like myself, have just stumbled upon Greta Thunberg, she is a Swedish sixteen-year-old environment activist who claims that adults are ruining her future because of the man-made global warming that has brought the human species to the brink of extinction. She gained media recognition in August of last year when she began protesting outside the Swedish parliament (the Riksdag) handing out flyers to adults calling for immediate action to combat climate change. Greta has even been encouraged by Pope Francis in her Join the climate strike (Fridays For Future) — it calls for people not to show up for work and children to skip going to classes on Fridays so that they may protest governments on climate change — “Continue, continue,” Francis told her. “Go on, go ahead.”

During her prepared discourse last month to the United Nations Action Summit, Greta practically broke down saying: “People are suffering, people are dying, entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of the mass extinction and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you?” Greta seems to be just like the Noble Prize winner Malala Yousafzai, the Muslim human rights activist, who like other Islamists, have personified themselves in the media as victims of religious hatred. With the help of United Nations and philanthropists, such as George Soros, they have orchestrated conditions through public communications utilizing defensive terminology and accusing anyone who questions their intentions or positions as racists.

Malala — as a teenager; she is now twenty-two years of age — is to be commended for her open stance against the Taliban and advocacy of education for girls and women in the Islamic world. Yet in an admonition to UK politicians a few years ago, she said: “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create,” which intimidates people into believing it is bigoted to examine jihadist doctrine and other sharia-based oppressive tenets as intimately linked with the Islamic religion. Malala has also never made any direct public refutation of the Quranic teachings and the attributed traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (the hadiths), which subjugate women to a second-class status and place them in the very situation she herself criticizes. Not to mention, while openly backing the Islamic religion, Malala has simultaneously pushed for the dictatorial, repressive, and atheistic politics of Communism as the only hope for peace. In 2013, after expressing her gratitude to Pakistani Marxists for introducing her to Marxism, she declared: “Socialism is the only answer and I urge all comrades to take this struggle to a victorious conclusion. Only this will free us from the chains of bigotry and exploitation.”

In like manner, Greta and other young people should also be congratulated for raising environmental concerns. She believes — it is more of her parents’ position she is presenting — that global warming is man-made, cutting global carbon emissions by half in the next decade will solve the the climate problem, despite many scientists arguing that “there is no correlation between rising CO2 levels and increased” climate change. Yes, there are toxics in the environment created by us that have to be addressed. Is that, however, causing climate change? — I am a layman in the science world, even though it is not the thesis of this article, common sense tells me that Mother Nature periodically changes and will take care of herself. That being said, both youngsters have subjectively presented one side of the picture without considering any valid points from a counterposition. Their approach has consequently accused social conservatives for not supporting UN and left-wing policies, which have nothing to do with collective security, let alone the dignity of the human person.

What is to be made of all of this? Greta and the school-striking teenagers, other than glibly mouthing the same solutions as their radical elder brothers do: “Shut down all coal mines immediately,” “Let all fossil fuels remain in the ground,” “All energy supply must come from renewable sources,” etc., have instigated rebellion by encouraging children to take it upon themselves to interrupt their education/schooling at will — parents and teachers are ultimately to blame. This is right in line with Article 15 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child: “Children have the right to think and believe what they want and to practice their religion.” Article 15 not only directly contradicts parents’ right and duty to properly raise their children — regardless of religious denomination — but it segregates them, too.

Yes, youngsters like Greta (and Malala), as well as other children do have a voice and can make a change for the better. However, what is happening with the Greta movement is not necessarily contributing to the common good of society. Instead, what is happening is a manipulation of children. Greta Thunberg and her young followers — as it was with Malala Yousafzai — have fallen into the whimsical traps of those who seek to create social disorder, and this is nothing other than child abuse.

As has been raised by a few, the UN, politicians, and the mainstream media do not raise how Greta’s “own parents and [she] herself have talked of her battle with depression and chronic anxiety. They talk of how anxious she was, Greta couldn’t go to school, couldn’t eat for two months, couldn’t speak at all for long periods.” One can understand why she was frantic during her UN speech. The sad result has thus far been, again, a child who  seems to be manipulated in order to promote ecological anarchism , thereby undermining the valor of the human person to physical surroundings. Youngsters should be reminded that they would be more effective by dedicating and sacrificing time to study in order to address the causes of the real human crisis that is presently extinguishing human beings: abortion, Christian persecution and the hands of Islamists, the military conflicts in the Middle East because of oil and other natural resources, and the like. As already mentioned, Mother Nature will eventually take care of herself, whereas human rights violations can only be handle by us.

Shepard Smith makes shocking announcement. He is leaving Fox News

Frequent critic of President Trump, Shepard Smith announced on Friday that he is leaving the Fox News network.

Shepard has been criticized by colleagues often for his liberal political views.

 Shepard had the highest ratings in his timeslot of any cable news show and was paid substantially for his role on Fox.

No word on what is next for Smith but one would assume a bidding war between CNN and MSNBC will begin for his services.

AOC cries at climate forum: ‘My dreams of motherhood are now bittersweet’

Congress Woman from New York Alexandria Ocasio Cortez got emotional and the climate forum about the fear of having children in the middle of such extreme “climate change”.

Last year Cortez made the news claiming we only have 12 years to live if something about Climate change is not done now.

“I speak to you not as an elected official or a public figure, but I speak to you as a human being,” the freshman congresswoman told a climate summit in Copenhagen.

“A woman whose dreams of motherhood now taste bittersweet, because of what I know about our children’s future,” she added, apparently choking back tears.

She was giving her keynote address at the C40 World Mayors Summit which recently approved a global version of her “Green New Deal.”

Ocasio-Cortez went on to decry the impacts of climate change and indicating that Puerto Ricans died because they lived “under colonial rule.”

“I speak to you as daughter and descendant of colonized peoples who have already begun to suffer. Just two years ago one of the deadliest disasters in the United States struck in the form of Hurricane Maria,” she said.

“The climate change-powered storm killed over 3,000 Puerto Ricans, American citizens — my own grandfather died in the aftermath — all because they were living under colonial rule, which contributed to the dire conditions and lack of recovery.”

She added that it wasn’t a “coincidence” that Hurricane Dorian had similar impacts on the Bahamas.

 “As many have noticed in an — noted in an awful turn the climate crisis has passed is first impacting those who have not only contributed to our emissions the least but have already suffered greatly in the global history of inequality, colonization, and imperialism stacking one injustice upon another,” she said.

The New York congresswoman traveled to Copenhagen for a meeting with the C40, a group of 94 mayors led by Los Angeles’ Mayor Eric Garcetti — who was just announced as the group’s new chair. There, several U.S. mayors supported the “Global Green New Deal.”

The plan aims to halve carbon emissions by 2030 through cleaner alternatives and the “strictest possible building codes.” It also seeks to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement’s goal of keeping warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Breaking: Hunter Biden stepping down from Chinese firm, vows no foreign work if father wins in 2020

Thursday night in Minneapolis President Trump asked the simple question, where is Hunter? Despite being the focal point of the news the past few weeks Hunter Biden was in hiding.

 Making sure he would not appear in front of camera so he does not have to answer questions about his dishonest business practices.

Now he has announced he is stepping down from the Chinese firm that paid him billions.

Former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, is reportedly stepping down from the board of a Chinese company and will not to engage in any foreign work if his father is elected president in 2020.

“Hunter always understood that his father would be guided, entirely and unequivocally, by established U.S. policy, regardless of its effects on Hunter’s professional interests,” his lawyer, George Mesires, said in a statement, according to Bloomberg.

“He never anticipated the barrage of false charges against both him and his father by the President of the United States.”

“Under a Biden Administration, Hunter will readily comply with any and all guidelines or standards a President Biden may issue to address purported conflicts of interest, or the appearance of such conflicts, including any restrictions related to overseas business interests,” the statement continued.

 “He will continue to keep his father personally uninvolved in his business affairs.”

Just In: Liberal Icon, Matt Lauer, Accused of Rape

Opinion| According to a report from Variety, Ronan Farrow’s most recent book, “Catch and Kill,” delves into his investigation into Harvey Weinstein, the obstacles NBC threw at him, and all the dirty details.

Farrow’s book mentions an interview with former NBC employee Brooke Nevils, who issued a complaint against Lauer in 2017, leading to his termination from the “Today” show.

According to Variety, “At the time, NBC News kept Nevils’ identity anonymous from press reports at her request. The full details of her allegations have not been made public until now. In the book, obtained by Variety, Nevils alleges that at the 2014 Sochi Olympics, Lauer anally raped her in his hotel room.”

In a public statement, NBC News said, “Matt Lauer’s conduct was appalling, horrific and reprehensible, as we said at the time. That’s why he was fired within 24 hours of us first learning of the complaint. Our hearts break again for our colleague.”

Lauer’s attorney granted Variety access to an open letter in which all wrongdoing is denied. The former NBC host said, “In a new book, it is alleged that an extramarital, but consensual, sexual encounter I have previously admitted having, was in fact an assault. It is categorically false, ignores the facts, and defies common sense.”

More from Variety:

Follow Illicit Info on Spreely, the social media site for Patriots

In Sochi, Nevils was tasked with working with former “Today” co-anchor Meredith Vieira, who’d been brought back to the show to do Olympics coverage. In Nevils’ account, one night over drinks with Vieira at the hotel bar where the NBC News team was staying, they ran into Lauer, who joined them. At the end of the night, Nevils, who’d had six shots of vodka, ended up going to Lauer’s hotel room twice — once to retrieve her press credential, which Lauer had taken as a joke, and the second time because he invited her back. Nevils, Farrow writes, “had no reason to suspect Lauer would be anything but friendly based on prior experience.”

Once she was in his hotel room, Nevils alleges, Lauer — who was wearing a T-shirt and boxers — pushed her against the door and kissed her. He then pushed her onto the bed, “flipping her over, asking if she liked anal sex,” Farrow writes. “She said that she declined several times.”

According to Nevils, she “was in the midst of telling him she wasn’t interested again when he ‘just did it,’” Farrow writes. “Lauer, she said, didn’t use lubricant. The encounter was excruciatingly painful. ‘It hurt so bad. I remember thinking, Is this normal?’ She told me she stopped saying no, but wept silently into a pillow.” Lauer then asked her if she liked it. She tells him yes. She claims that “she bled for days,” Farrow writes.

Nevils told Farrow, “It was nonconsensual in the sense that I was too drunk to consent,” she says. “It was nonconsensual in that I said, multiple times, that I didn’t want to have anal sex.”

Lauer answered the accusation in his letter saying, “I had an extramarital affair with Brooke Nevils in 2014. It began when she came to my hotel room very late one night in Sochi, Russia. We engaged in a variety of sexual acts. We performed oral sex on each other, we had vaginal sex, and we had anal sex. Each act was mutual and completely consensual.”

Nevils reported other sexual encounters with Lauer in New York City.

“Sources close to Lauer emphasized that she sometimes initiated contact,” Farrow wrote. “What is not in dispute is that Nevils, like several of the women I’d spoken to, had further sexual encounters with the man she said assaulted her.”

Nevils reportedly stated, “This is what I blame myself most for. It was completely transactional. It was not a relationship.”

Nevils had extreme concern when it came to Lauer’s power over her career. When the relationship with Lauer came to an end, Nevils stated that she mentioned it to “like a million people.”

“She told colleagues and superiors at NBC,” Farrow explained.

When Nevils moved to NBC’s Peacock Productions to become a producer, she “reported it to one of her new bosses there.”

“This was no secret,” Farrow continued.

Variety explains that “Nothing happened until fall 2017, when the post-Harvey Weinstein reckoning led former ‘Today’ colleagues to ask her about Lauer. Nevils told Farrow she then went to Vieira and told her what had happened. A distraught Vieira, according to the book, urged Nevils to go to NBC Universal human resources with a lawyer, which she did. After Lauer’s firing, she learned that Noah Oppenheim, the president of NBC News, and Andrew Lack, the chairman of NBC News and MSNBC, ‘were emphasizing that the incident hadn’t been ‘criminal’ or an ‘assault’’ — which she claims caused her to throw up, Farrow writes.”

Farrow explains, “Nevils’s work life became torture. She was made to sit in the same meetings as everyone else, discussing the news, and in all of them colleagues loyal to Lauer cast doubt on the claims, and judgment on her.”

Visit Illicit Info's homepage for more stories
“The network proposed a script she would have to read, suggesting that she had left to pursue other endeavors, that she was treated well, and that NBC News was a positive example of sexual harassment,” Farrow continues.

NBC News’ statement made it known that they moved quickly once the formal complaint was made against Lauer.

Death of Globalism: United Nations Will Likely Be Out of Cash By The End of October According To Reports

Opinion| It has been reported that the United Nations is currently in a deficit of $230 million. The news was revealed by Secretary General Antonio Guterres this past Monday. He explained that the UN might be totally out of money be the end of this month. The only thing that will turn this around is if all world governments come up with their financial obligations ASAP.

According to Breitbart News, “U.S. taxpayers would most likely be hardest hit by any immediate cash injection into the global organization. The United States is by far the U.N.’s biggest financial contributor, providing 22 percent of its operating budget and funding 28 percent of peacekeeping missions, which currently cost $8 billion annually. The next two major contributors are Germany and the U.K.”

A letter written to the 37,000 United Nations employees stated that they would have to take “additional stop-gap measures” to make sure that they meet salaries and entitlements.

This may mean that the UN will hold less meetings and limit traveling and other associated entitlements.

“Member States have paid only 70 per cent of the total amount needed for our regular budget operations in 2019. This translates into a cash shortage of $230 million at the end of September. We run the risk of depleting our backup liquidity reserves by the end of the month,” Guterres wrote.

President Trump has been trying to reform the UN for a while. It was just last week that he stated that the “future does not belong to globalists” when issuing a warning to the  leaders of the organization.

Follow Illicit Info on Spreely, the social media site for Patriots

Breitbart News explains:

In December 2017 Nikki Haley, the then United States Ambassador to the organization, announced the federal government had reduced its contribution to the U.N.’s annual budget by $285 million, as Breitbart News reported.

Haley’s statement came after the U.N. voted to condemn the United States for President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. The resolution, backed by nations with long records of extreme human rights abuses, passed 128-9. Haley immediately responded by threatening to reduce America’s U.N. funding.

“The United States will remember this day in which it was singled out for attack in the General Assembly for the very act of exercising our right as a sovereign nation,” Haley said in front of the New York City assembly.

She continued, “We will remember it when we are called upon to once again make the world’s largest contribution to the United Nations and we will remember it when so many countries come calling on us, as they so often do, to pay even more and to use our influence for their benefit.”

Why Is FBI Still Refusing to Release The Information it Has on S*th R*ch? Attorney Ty Clevenger Aims to Find Out.

Opinion – Speculation – Analysis –  In mid-July, Ty Clevenger filed a lawsuit on behalf of his client Ed Butowsky.  Butowsky was under attack for suggesting Seth Rich as the source of leaked information from the DNC server and not Russia.

The circumstances of Seth Rich’s murder have never been made public.  Perhaps because the FBI played some role in it. Or, is protecting those who did.

From the outset it appeared that the failure to investigate the murder of the young, idealistic, Democrat operative’s possible involvement in the DNC leak was avoided for political purposes, despite ever increasing evidence pointing to Rich.

Famed internet hacker Kim Dotcom even admitted to being Rich’s accomplice.

 Yet the same intelligence community that spent three years trying to convict Donald Trump for a crime he didn’t commit, never interviewed Kim Dotcom or Julian Assange, who was the ultimate source of the DNC leaks.

Follow Illicit Info on Spreely, the social media site for Patriots

Instead, Assange languishes in jail where his testimony cannot be heard.

The premise that the FBI proffered, that the DNC server had been hacked by Russians from a remote location, never passed the smell test:

Clevenger, who has sued the FBI for proof that Rich was the source of the DNC leak, in order to clear his client of making false charges, wrote:

Newly released documents from the FBI suggest that the Obama White House pushed intelligence agencies to publicly blame the Russians for email leaks from the Democratic National Committee to Wikileaks.

This afternoon I received an undated (and heavily redacted) transcript of an interview of James Rybicki, former chief of staff to former FBI Director James Comey, that includes this excerpt: “So we understand that at some point in October of 2016, there was, I guess, a desire by the White House to make some kind of statement about Russia’s…” and then the next page is omitted…

That almost certainly refers to the October 7, 2016 joint statement of the Department of Homeland Security and the Directorate of National Intelligence that the “U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations.”

In other words, it looks like the Obama White House put its thumb on the scale, pressuring intelligence agencies to adopt the Democratic National Committee’s talking points, i.e., to blame the stolen emails on Russian hackers rather than an internal source (like Seth Rich).

If the public was in fact, and then ever learns that they were played by the FBI and Robert “What’s Fusion GPS” Mueller – that the Russians had no role in the DNC server leak – the intelligence agencies would be gravely discredited, as would Obama.

No wonder the FBI is tight-lipped about this information even though it doesn’t threaten national security in any way. 

The same intelligence community that spent three years trying to convict Donald Trump over a theory of the crime they knew to be false, now appears to be blocking evidence that the Obama White House pressured those intelligence agencies to blame Russia.

That decision plunged America into distrust and divisiveness.

Visit Illicit Info's homepage for more stories

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” – Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister

Democrat Hopefully, Warren, Allegedly Caught Lying About Her History Yet Again

Opinion| Democratic Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren has thrown her name out there as a Presidential hopeful, but how can the American people trust someone who seemingly continues to misrepresent her past?

Warren recently claimed that she had been promised a job when she was 6 months pregnant, however the job was given to someone else.

According to Conservative duo Diamond & Silk, “Before Warren was desperate for votes nationwide, she told a different version of this event. Her version in the past was that she was not qualified for long term employment and chose to take ‘years’ off after giving birth to her child instead of pursuing the classes required for certification.”

Fox News reported on that interview, “Several times on the campaign trail, Warren suggested that she was effectively fired from a school where she taught children with special needs because she was ‘visibly pregnant.’ However, in a 2007 interview, Warren appeared to have left on her own accord.”

Warren stated, “My first-year post-graduation, I worked — it was in a public school system but I worked with the children with disabilities. I did that for a year, and then that summer I actually didn’t have the education courses, so I was on an ’emergency certificate,’ it was called. I went back to graduate school and took a couple of courses in education and said, ‘I don’t think this is going to work out for me. I was pregnant with my first baby, so I had a baby and stayed home for a couple of years, and I was really casting about, thinking, ‘What am I going to do?’”
In an interview with CBS News on Monday, Warren stood by what she has repeatedly said on the campaign trail.

“All I know is I was 22 years old, I was 6 months pregnant, and the job that I had been promised for the next year was going to someone else. The principal said they were going to hire someone else for my job,” Warren told CBS News.

 Her campaign also issued a statement in an attempted to explain the discrepancy between now and 2007, implying that she has learned to “open up” since she became a public figure.”
Visit Illicit Info's homepage for more stories
It’s not uncommon for politicians to flip flop around and alter themselves in order to become a more appealing candidate for voters. Warren is no stranger to this kind of behavior, as she has continually made claims of having Native American heritage. She was proven wrong, but never apologized for her claims. How can the American people trust someone who continually lies?

This victim culture has to stop!